Current:Home > ScamsHarvard Study Finds Exxon Misled Public about Climate Change-LoTradeCoin
Harvard Study Finds Exxon Misled Public about Climate Change
View Date:2024-12-24 00:24:03
Stay informed about the latest climate, energy and environmental justice news by email. Sign up for the ICN newsletter.
A comprehensive, peer-reviewed academic study of ExxonMobil’s internal deliberations, scientific research and public rhetoric over the decades has confirmed empirically that the oil giant misled the public about what it knew about climate change and the risks posed by fossil fuel emissions, the authors said on Tuesday.
The paper confirms the findings of a 2015 investigative series by InsideClimate News that was based largely on the company’s internal records, and also of independent work published by the Los Angeles Times. That reporting ignited investigations by state attorneys general that are still in litigation.
“On the question of whether ExxonMobil misled non-scientific audiences about climate science, our analysis supports the conclusion that it did,” Geoffrey Supran and Naomi Oreskes of Harvard University wrote in the study, published today in the scientific journal Environmental Research Letters.
Across the board, the paper found “a systematic discrepancy between what ExxonMobil’s scientists and executives discussed about climate change privately and in academic circles and what it presented to the general public,” the authors said.
“ExxonMobil contributed quietly to the science and loudly to raising doubts about it,” they wrote.
The authors explicitly rejected Exxon’s main defense, which was to claim that journalists were “cherry picking” the company’s record and that its positions had always been in step with the state of the science. The company often said that anyone who read the full documentary record would see matters Exxon’s way.
The Harvard researchers said their task was to accept Exxon’s challenge to review the full record. Among the documents they examined were dozens cited in ICN’s work, as well as more than 50 scientific papers Exxon frequently mentioned in its own defense and its issue advertising.
Supran and Oreskes called their conclusions “an expansive, quantitative, independent corroboration of the findings of investigative journalists.”
In an interview, Supran said the evidence was unambiguous.
The authors reviewed 187 public and internal Exxon documents over the past four decades, including many that were brought to light by ICN’s reporting.
In one finding, they judged that 83 percent of peer-reviewed papers written by company scientists and 80 percent of the company’s internal communications acknowledged that climate change is real and caused by humans. But among Exxon’s advertisements on the editorial pages of The New York Times, a proxy for communications aimed at a broad public audience, only 12 percent acknowledged climate change as real and human-caused, while 81 percent expressed doubt.
Among the documents examined were scientific papers, internal company memos, and paid editorial-style advertisements in The New York Times. The documents were scored by reviewers in a standard social-science approach known as content analysis, with an aim of evaluating their viewpoints on climate change and quantifying the consistency of Exxon’s communications.
Reviewers looked at the company’s views of climate change as real, human-caused, serious and solvable.
They also examined a key point that has come up in recent years: whether the company faces a financial risk of stranded assets as policy makers shift world economies away from fossil fuels because their emissions cause global warming.
Their work was supported by Harvard University Faculty Development Funds and by the Rockefeller Family Fund, which has also supported InsideClimate News.
ICN’s series in 2015, Exxon: The Road Not Taken, won an array of journalism prizes and was a finalist for the 2016 Pulitzer Prize for Public Service. It described how Exxon conducted cutting-edge climate research decades ago and how the company then pivoted to the forefront of climate denial, manufacturing doubt about the climate consensus and the dangers that its own scientists had confirmed.
In an interview, Supran said that the company’s “pattern of discrepant, misleading climate communication” seems still pertinent today, even though the documents analyzed here dated back many years.
It’s not just the dissonance he sees between Exxon’s more recent formal endorsement of a carbon tax and the refusal of almost anyone the company supports in Congress to embrace that kind of climate solution.
“The company’s apparent acknowledgement of climate science and its implications,” he said, “seems dramatically at odds with basically its current business practice.”
Supran cited Exxon’s push, thwarted by sanctions so far, to drill in Siberia along with the Russian company Rosneft, even though “that oil and gas resource, the largest untapped oil and gas resource left in the entire world, is quantifiably incompatible with holding warming below 2 degrees,” the internationally accepted goal.
“In terms of the company’s rhetoric and business practices,” he concluded, “there is a pattern of discrepancy between what the company says and what the company does.”
Exxon, which did not have access in advance to the full paper under terms of a news embargo imposed by the journal publishing it, did not respond to emails on Tuesday requesting comment.
veryGood! (1)
Related
- American arrested in death of another American at luxury hotel in Ireland
- Shop the Best Levi's Jeans Deals on Amazon for as Low as $21
- SAG Awards 2023 Winners: See the Complete List
- Stock Your Car With These Spring Essentials From Amazon Before Your Next Road Trip
- DWTS’ Ilona Maher and Alan Bersten Have the Best Reaction to Fans Hoping for a Romance
- Attorney General Merrick Garland makes unannounced trip to Ukraine
- We ask 3 Broadway photographers: How do you turn a live show into a still image?
- Emily Blunt’s Floral 2023 SAG Awards Look Would Earn Her Praise From Miranda Priestly
- Biden funded new factories and infrastructure projects, but Trump might get to cut the ribbons
- The final season of the hit BBC crime series 'Happy Valley' has come to the U.S.
Ranking
- John Krasinski Revealed as People's Sexiest Man Alive 2024
- Emily King's heartbreak on 'Special Occasion'
- Ed Sheeran reveals his wife was diagnosed with a tumor while pregnant
- 'The Bear' has beef (and heart)
- Candidates line up for special elections to replace Virginia senators recently elected to US House
- The 47 Most Popular Amazon Items E! Readers Bought This Month
- 'An Amerikan Family' traces the legacy of Tupac Shakur's influential family
- How the SCOTUS 'Supermajority' is shaping policy on everything from abortion to guns
Recommendation
-
Hurricane forecasters on alert: November storm could head for Florida
-
40 years ago, NPR had to apologize for airing 'Return of the Jedi' spoilers
-
Prince Harry and Meghan asked to vacate royal Frogmore Cottage home as it's reportedly offered to Prince Andrew
-
'Transformers: Rise of the Beasts' has got your fightin' robots right here
-
John Krasinski Details Moment He Knew Wife Emily Blunt Was “the One”
-
SAG Awards 2023 Red Carpet Fashion: See Every Look as the Stars Arrive
-
Ukrainian civilians grapple with heart-wrenching decisions as Russian forces surround Bakhmut
-
We grapple with 'The Flash'